Hidden Language in Visual Analytics: Roland Barthes Critique

Have you ever considered how images communicate meaning beyond their surface appearance? Roland Barthes certainly did. He argued that visuals are not mere representations but complex messages that intertwine literal and symbolic meanings, shaped by our cultural backgrounds. This insight, central to Barthes' critique, reveals that images operate on multiple levels—denotation, connotation, and mythication—each contributing to our understanding. It’s a fascinating exploration that challenges us to recognize the power of visuals in shaping our perceptions and emotions. By examining how language anchors these images, Barthes invites us to rethink our relationship with visual media, suggesting that what we see is often influenced by what we know, making the act of interpretation a deeply personal and culturally informed experience."

Lina Lghali

1/7/20257 min read

Roland Barthes' ideas on the rhetoric of the image reveal how visuals communicate through a blend of literal and symbolic meanings, shaped by cultural knowledge and anchored by language. This interplay of signs transforms images into powerful tools for conveying complex messages.

Understanding the Image: Etymology and Purpose

Historically speaking, the etymology of the word “image” emanates from a Latin expression “imago”; which stands for a waxy mask that was put over the faces of dead bodies in order to appease the wrath of gods. However, nowadays the meaning of “image” has drastically changed: Today, the image (be it static or moving) is the cornerstone of media, because an image has now become a text; given that it needs to be studied using semiology. Both American and European scholars agree on analyzing an image through the denotation and connotation levels. Hence, Roland Barthes didn’t stop at these levels bur rather opened new horizons, introducing the mythication level (also known as the non-coded iconic message). In today’s world, it is commonly believed that “an image is worth a thousand words”. Indeed, and image can convey various messages to the public, leading to diverse and multiple interpretations which enhance the complexity of the image analysis.

Fundamentals of Visual Rhetoric: Understanding the Basics of Image Communication

The passage under study by Roland Barthes discusses how images, especially those used in advertising, communicate meaning and convey messages to viewers. It raises important questions about the nature of images and whether they can work like language to create meaningful signs. The author examines the complexities of how we understand images and identifies three main types of messages that can be found in an image. But first let us discuss the basics of image rhetoric. According to Barthes, image rhetoric is the study of how messages communicate messages and create meaning. For further understanding, Timothy McGee, a modern American sociologist, explains in his YouTube videos, that Barthes himself is very much influenced by structuralist linguistics (coined by Ferdinand de Saussure) and explores how language and images communicate meaning. Thus, Saussure’s idea of the signifier and the signified is fundamental: McGee explains that Barthes makes the difference between language and image. The language operates through arbitrary relationships between signs while images often communicate analogically (for example: a picture of a tomato actually corresponds to a tomato whereas the word alone “tomato” doesn’t share any relationship with its representation in the real world). McGee also argues that Roland Barthes uses advertisement as a case study: he uses the French advertisement for the Italian pasta “Panzani” to demonstrate how the rhetoric of the image operates and how images convey intentional messages. Advertising images are easier to analyze as their intent (to sell) is clear. It is then very important to understand the rhetoric of an image because images are everywhere in our lives, from advertisements to social media. They can influence our thoughts, feelings, and actions without us even realizing it. By understanding how images work, we can become more aware of the messages they send and how they affect us.

Three Dimensions of Image Analysis: Exploring Levels of Interpretation

Next, we will look at the different types of messages that images can convey. There are two main types: literal and symbolic meanings. Barthes argues that images operate on different levels and integrate both perception and learned cultural understanding:

  • The Linguistic Message: (Denotation level) it refers to the text that usually accompanies the image, such as a caption or an advertisement slogan. This text plays a crucial role in helping the public understand what the image represents. It identifies the objects or scenes depicted and provides context. For example, if an advertisement shows a plate of food, the accompanying text might say, "Delicious pasta with fresh tomatoes." This helps the viewer to immediately recognize and understand the content of the image. Words can “anchor” and image, limiting its possible meanings by focusing the viewer on a specific interpretation. Images without words can seem more open-ended but are still loaded with cultural connotations.

  • The Coded Iconic Message: (Connotation level) This type of message refers to the meanings that are culturally understood and can be interpreted based on shared knowledge. These meanings are not explicitly stated but are inferred from the visual elements in the image. For instance, certain colors or symbols might evoke specific feelings or associations. In an advertisement for Italian food, the presence of tomatoes, basil, and pasta may signal an Italian theme, which is understood through cultural context. This requires viewers to have some background knowledge about these symbols to fully grasp the intended message. The deeper cultural or symbolic meanings, like how tomatoes or flag-like colors (red, green, white) made us think of Italian cuisine.

  • The Non-Coded Iconic Message: (Mythication level) this message represents the basic, literal interpretation of what is visible in the image. It relies on general recognition of objects without needing specialized knowledge. For example, if someone sees a picture of a tomato, they recognize it as a tomato based on their everyday experiences. This understanding is almost instinctual and doesn’t require any additional context or cultural knowledge.

Roland Barthes emphasizes that images can be rich in meaning and open to various interpretations. This complexity means that different viewers might see different things in the same image based on their own experiences and knowledge. In advertising, the goal is to clearly communicate a specific message to the audience. Advertisers use images strategically to guide viewers toward certain interpretations, ensuring that the intended message is understood. Moreover, the text highlights the relationship between images and language in conveying meaning. While images can evoke emotions and associations, the accompanying text helps to anchor these feelings and clarify the message. This interplay between visual and linguistic elements creates a more powerful communication tool, especially in advertising, where the aim is often to persuade or attract consumers.

From Image to Emotion: How the Panzani Ad Connects with Cultural Identity

In the Panzani ad, we see a vibrant display of Mediterranean vegetables, such as tomatoes, peppers, and pasta, arranged in an appealing way. This image is rich in colors and shapes that immediately catch our attention. For someone familiar with Italian cuisine, these vegetables may evoke feelings of freshness, health, and the joy of cooking. The bright red of the tomatoes, for instance, can symbolize ripeness and quality, which is very important in Italian cooking. Ads like the example of the Italian good products are designed to look casual or “authentic” while carefully staged to evoke specific feelings like freshness, quality, or cultural identity. Cultural knowledge plays a key role here. An Italian viewer might see this ad and think of family meals, traditional recipes, or even memories of visiting local markets. This connection to culture helps them understand the ad's message: that Panzani products can bring the taste of Italy into their home. On the other hand, someone from a different culture might not have the same associations with these vegetables. They might see the same image but interpret it differently, perhaps focusing on the colors or shapes without the deeper cultural meanings. Our interpretation of images depends on learned cultural symbols (like the tomato symbolizing Italian cooking). Barthes explains that meaning comes from how language and visual elements combine to make us feel or think differently. Images are “read” differently than text. They present everything at once, unlike words, which come in sequence. Yet, they rely on linguistic and cultural cues to convey their messages. By blending these elements, Barthes shows how images communicate complex ideas, often in 1 subtle and powerful way, particularly in advertisement.

What Role Does Language Play in Anchoring Meaning in Visual Communication?

Moreover, it is important to understand that cultural knowledge is essential because it shapes how we understand and interpret images. Each person brings their own experiences, beliefs, and values to the way they view an image. For example, an image of a tomato might mean something different to someone who has grown up in Italy, where tomatoes are a staple in many dishes, compared to someone from a culture where tomatoes are less common. In the Italian context, a tomato might symbolize freshness, home-cooked meals, or even the essence of Italian cuisine. This cultural background influences how people perceive the image and what feelings or memories it might evoke. Our interpretation of images depends on learned cultural symbols (like tomato symbolizing Italian cooking). Barthes explains that meaning comes from how language and visual elements combine to make us feel or think a certain way. Moreover, images use different signs to communicate messages. Signs can include colors, shapes, objects, and even the arrangement of elements within the image. Each of these signs can carry specific meanings that may vary across cultures. For instance, the color red can symbolize love and passion in one culture, while in another, it might represent danger or warning. Understanding these signs is crucial because they help convey the image's message beyond just what is visually present.

The Function of Language in Establishing Meaning: Anchoring Visual Messages

When an image is accompanied by text, such as a caption or a slogan, it helps clarify the message that the image is trying to communicate. This process is known as "anchorage." Anchorage helps to direct the viewer’s attention and can limit the range of meanings that they might consider. For example, in the Panzani advertisement, if the image of the fresh vegetables is paired with a caption like "Taste the freshness of Italy," it anchors the viewer's understanding. This text tells us that the focus is on freshness and Italian cuisine, which shapes how we interpret the colorful display of vegetables. Without this anchoring language, the image might be open to many interpretations. The viewer could see the vegetables and think of different things, like a general idea of health or cooking, but the specific connection to Italian food might not be as strong. The caption provides a clear direction, making it easier for the viewer to understand the intended message. This is especially important in advertising, where the goal is to persuade the audience to buy a product. In the Panzani ad, the language works hand-in-hand with the visual elements. The vibrant colors and appealing arrangement of the vegetables create a feeling of abundance and quality, while the text reinforces this by highlighting the idea of freshness. Together, they create a strong message that suggests that using Panzani products will bring the authentic taste of Italy into the viewer's kitchen.

Conclusion

by now we have explored how images communicate meaning and how cultural knowledge and language influence our understanding of them. We looked at the way images, like the Panzani advertisement, and how these messages can change depending on who is viewing them. We also found that cultural background plays a big role in how we interpret images. What one person sees and feels when looking at an image might be very different from someone else's experience. Additionally, we learned that language is important for anchoring the meanings of images. Words can help guide our thoughts and feelings, making it easier to understand the message that the image is trying to communicate. Looking ahead, research in this field should focus on how different cultures interpret images and language in various contexts. It would be valuable to study how people from different backgrounds respond to the same images and how language can shape those responses. This can help us create more effective communication strategies that resonate with diverse audiences. Thus, by understanding the relationship between images, cultures, and language we can better appreciate how visual content communicates meaning and influences our perceptions. This knowledge can lead to more thoughtful and effective ways to share messages through images.